Re: [RFS] rocm-smi-lib/4.5.2-1~exp1 - copyright question
- To: Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt@fastmail.com>, "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-ai@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [RFS] rocm-smi-lib/4.5.2-1~exp1 - copyright question
- From: Cordell Bloor <cgmb-deb@slerp.xyz>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:36:45 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] ca9d58a7-3708-f8cd-e3f3-e4cd3d9bf0e2@slerp.xyz>
- In-reply-to: <745b13a1-8d5d-c736-2adf-4b46b4ee7ce9@slerp.xyz>
- References: <1579f277-446b-eb4c-7f89-43e3d1ecda8e@maxzor.eu> <YfxPTz+uhOoas11/@fusion> <f81321ed5234a97f1872ebd959da58230c994064.camel@debian.org> <6cefce78-ecde-c123-615d-a26d2862b274@maxzor.eu> <bcc3ab077b3cac050ae7390db59cf898dbb4eb36.camel@debian.org> <YgwqCj0RJTFeVd6h@fusion> <8b3af19d-f348-17c9-bac8-77dd7e805665@maxzor.eu> <Yg1xo10MnrClnl6o@fusion> <ba4759dd5d6a51b10f3a256ba375abcc5fa2a6d6.camel@debian.org> <A9C89ADA-8C9C-4063-871D-5E97DD60DA3E@fastmail.com> <745b13a1-8d5d-c736-2adf-4b46b4ee7ce9@slerp.xyz>
Hello,
Just following up on the 'trade secret' statements in the the ROCclr INI
parser.
On 2022-02-17 15:48, Cordell Bloor wrote:
I'm still working to get clarification on this issue, but I think we
can drop those files. The "gslbe" directory is for the GSL back end,
and I don't think it's a required component of ROCclr. We can partly
or completely remove that back end and ROCclr will still be a useful
library.
The GSL back end is going to be dropped in ROCm 5.1. The commit removing
it has now been published on the public develop branch [1]. The problem
files have been deleted.
[1]:
https://github.com/ROCm-Developer-Tools/ROCclr/commit/2333c6a90f6ee9a917e1706c9d092935653593bd
Sincerely,
Cory Bloor
Reply to: