Re: rocminfo & rocm-compilersupport & rocm-smi

[Maxime Chambonnet <maxzor@maxzor.eu>]

Sylvestre and the rest of the Debian llvm maintainers do not like the idea
of an llvm-is-llvmN augmenting the package llvm-defaults, nor of an 
llvm-toolchain-N meta-package :<

Also, rocm-smi-lib is ready for finalization/upload.

BR, Maxime

On 2/15/22 17:18, Maxime Chambonnet wrote:
> Do you understand the issue?
> It builds fine here.
> Is it a lack of symlink in /usr/bin/clang[++]?
> There is in BD libclang-14-dev. Is it better with a clang-14 BD?
> I contemplate the idea of making llvm packages llvm-is-llvmN,
> in the fashion of python-is-python3.
>
> On 2/15/22 17:05, M. Zhou wrote:
> > rocminfo has been uploaded. comgr FTBFS because cmake cannot find
> > ClangConfig
> >
> > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/rocm-compilersupport/5.0.0-1/buildlog 
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 07:35 +0100, Maxime Chambonnet wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > to me,rocminfo is ready, and comgr is
> > > an ITP bug short of ready for upload.