Re: CMake musings for ROCm 4.5.2 (Was Re: ROCm packaging session memo)

To: Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt@fastmail.com>, Cordell Bloor <cgmb-deb@slerp.xyz>, arsenm2@gmail.com
Cc: debian-ai@lists.debian.org, yeluo@anl.gov
Subject: Re: CMake musings for ROCm 4.5.2 (Was Re: ROCm packaging session memo)
From: Maxime Chambonnet <maxzor@maxzor.eu>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 18:21:40 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] dcc3fbb0-dea5-2793-4e2b-7b81e4e08aac@maxzor.eu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] f2a19bcd-2f5a-9752-5d70-88e9dd678aa0@maxzor.eu>
References: <53172875-4c4d-d004-beca-675b11b95437@maxzor.eu> <401ca4c82ffb7bf2244142108e13e5897d9856c8.camel@debian.org> <YfL9W8s1SeSNmSEy@fusion> <806728ca-a6e7-d7c8-8d51-98a21046fb4d@maxzor.eu> <FC1E8C4E-5108-457E-8C5E-03F44A811088@fastmail.com> <[🔎] f2a19bcd-2f5a-9752-5d70-88e9dd678aa0@maxzor.eu>

Ahem, please ignore the debug part ':)

Do you know why libamdhip64.so does not build with debug symbols?
I would like to focus next days on running debug sessions on HIP,
and possibly inside compute kernels too.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: CMake musings for ROCm 4.5.2 (Was Re: ROCm packaging session memo)
  - From: Maxime Chambonnet <maxzor@maxzor.eu>

Prev by Date: Re: CMake musings for ROCm 4.5.2 (Was Re: ROCm packaging session memo)
Next by Date: Processing of faiss_1.7.2-4_source.changes
Previous by thread: Re: CMake musings for ROCm 4.5.2 (Was Re: ROCm packaging session memo)
Next by thread: Processing of faiss_1.7.2-4_source.changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread