Hi Cory, Cordell Bloor, on 2021-11-28: > I'm sure there's much to discuss, so it seems appropriate to arrange another > meeting. Given how much interest there has been from Europe, it seems like I > should choose a different time. I've been terrible at converting dates and > times, so I'm not going to try. If you have at time you'd like, this is my > availability: https://calendly.com/cgmb/debian It took me a bit of time to parse calendly, but once I clicked on December it's been much more clear to me. Thank you so much for your availability! I try 2021-11-30T19:00:00 UTC as a starter (I believe it'd be before noon for you, the same date), but I suppose it would be more convenient or convivial to arrange to be several developpers at once. > I'll be in the meeting room tomorrow at the same time as last week, but > don't feel obligated to show up for that one. I'll do a second session this > week at whatever time seems to work for other people, and then we'll figure > out a better schedule going forward. Ack, there are chances I will fall asleep by then. > On the agenda for the next meeting: > > 1. What components need changes to be properly packaged? > > 2. Is there any other information I need to provide to facilitate packaging > the components in the script? > > 3. What components should I work on next? For what it's worth, I updated rocm-cmake [1] to 4.5.0 and enabled the pipeline [2], to start somewhere. Maybe a packaging example can be some further discussion material? [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/rocm-team/rocm-cmake/ [2]: https://salsa.debian.org/rocm-team/rocm-cmake/-/pipelines/319086 Kind Regards, -- Étienne Mollier <emollier@emlwks999.eu> Fingerprint: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da Sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature