Re: Meta: Maintainer/Process mails
Hi Christian,
I understand your point. Let's see how the others think about it.
Anyway, the simplest way to reduce noise for this list is to revert
the maintainer address back into the science team address.
For packages not yet affected by the maintainer-mail-address-change:
(1) science / machine learning / deep learning related:
Maintainer-Mail: d-science@lists.alioth.d.o
(2) rocm related
Maintainer-Main: team+rocm-team@tracker.debian.org
Both moving forward or back work for me.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:20:03AM +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
> One side effect of using debian-ai@lists.debian.org as Maintainer is
> that all maintainer mails will go there: ftp-master mails, bug reports,
> etc.
>
> We don't have many packages yet, but multiply the count by 10x and we'll
> have quite a load of (what I consider) low S/N-ratio mails.
>
> Is this just my view, or do others share it, too? In the latter case:
> how do we best address it? Should we mirror debian-science and ask for a
> list on https://alioth-lists.debian.net? Science Team packages have
>
> debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> which use the above service. See [1] for the archives.
>
> [1] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/
>
>
> PS: This is a mostly cosmetic issue for me, as the S/N-ratio is low, but
> not zero. I'd certainly subscribed to debian-sciences-maintainers as well.
> I'm mostly concerned about subscribers for whom the ratio is zero, which
> will be most non-Maintainers, I guess -- regular users, and so on.
>
Reply to: