Re: arch-dependent files in -dev packages
Björn Persson wrote:
> I fail to imagine why anyone would write architecture-dependent
> package specifications in Ada.
GNAT has the specification of package System, which is
architecture-dependent by definition.
But otherwise yes. You should be able to put them in a package or
subprogram body.
> Anyway, here's my draft proposal for a specification:
Looks sensible.
A few comments:
> Bindir
Bin_Dir? Just to follow Ada identifier style a bit.
> Libexecdir
Lib_Exec_Dir? (As above.)
...
Greetings,
Jacob
--
Photos from the Faroe Islands:
http://billeder.sparre-andersen.dk/The_Faroe_Islands/
Reply to: