[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: creating and maintaining accessible Linux distros

> On Jan 6, 2022, at 06:53, Jeffery Mewtamer <mewtamer@gmail.com> wrote:
> I thought the Cathedral represented proprietary software and FOSS was
> the Bazaar in that old metaphor...

Yep, my mistake.  Actually, the difference is more like the BSDs and Linux.  There are only a few BSD Cathedrals (e.g., FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD), but hundreds of variants in the Linux Bazaar.

> Considering Debian's policy on only including FOSS in the main distro,
> targeting devices that target Linux might be the only sane option
> Mobian has at their disposal... though I'm not sure Debian loosening
> their stance on non-free software would help as much in the mobile
> arena as it would with PCs...

Point taken.

> ... With smartphone hardware, I understand it's practically
> unheard of for drivers to be available ...

I think the pmOS folks (and friends) have had some success at reverse engineering the hardware enough to write usable drivers.  At leaset, their Devices page seems to indicate some.  Also, a cell phone can function as a computing device even if the cell aspect is unavailable.  And, if Wi-Fi is available, it can even be used for email and such.

> Of course, the maybe ironic part here is that, if smartphone vendors
> made community support of older phones easier by making the drivers
> readily available, old phones might not have such lousy resell value.

> I don't think FOSS has had that much direct impact on the cell phone ecosystem.  In time, who knows...


Reply to: