Re: Iggdrasil, a new amazing screenreader
It is the a new screenreaders
Skickat från min iPhone
> 12 dec. 2021 kl. 10:59 skrev Pawel L. <pltechmail@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi,
> I think that the blind Linux community would benefit more from
> consolidating the knowledge of talented programmers and creating one,
> but maximally complete screen reader.
>
> I am sure that it would be better for all of us to effectively support
> the development of ORCA, as is the case with NVDA in Windows, than to
> start new projects.
>
> There are many ideas out there, but usually nothing comes of it.
>
> Take care,
> Pawel
>
>> On 11/5/21, Didier Spaier <didier@slint.fr> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Idem. It says a few things like "web new component" or "terminal, text"
>> when you focus something (the kind of object, somehow), that's about it.
>>
>> They need some time to go beyond that, which is fine, just no need to
>> hurry.
>>
>>> Le 05/11/2021 à 14:58, Vojtech šmiro a écrit :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> did you tried:
>>> https://github.com/yggdrasil-sr/yggdrasil-prototype/releases/download/v-0.4.20/yggdrasil-prototype.run
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dne 05. 11. 21 v 14:21 Didier Spaier napsal(a):
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I built it just typing "cargo build" at the root of the source tree.
>>>> this gave me a binary named yggdrasil-prototype.
>>>>
>>>> starting it didn't seem to do anything and no info on the website on
>>>> how to use it.
>>>>
>>>> I don't have the time to investigate further asking questions to the
>>>> developers, feel free to do it. Me, I will come back later.
>>>>
>>>> Didier
>>>>
>>>>> Le 05/11/2021 à 13:26, Vojtech šmiro a écrit :
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> do you heard about this screenreader? It's in Alpha, but it's really
>>>>> glad to see there is another option to work with linux. I want to
>>>>> inform many people to be interest in, because the project starts and
>>>>> every person who is interrested is important..
>>>>>
>>>>> https://yggdrasil-sr.github.io/
>>>>>
>>>>> Take care.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Vojta.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Reply to: