Re: Bug#890833: at-spi2-core: Intermittent 90s shutdown delay: at-spi-dbus-bus.service: State 'stop-sigterm' timed out
Hello,
We have some new on this 90s-delay computer shutdown: upstream has
committed something which might be fixing it. I have uploaded
at-spi2-core version 2.34.0-4 which includes it.
Could people who are regularly having the issue test this version? If it
does fix it, I'll probably propose uploading the fix to buster.
Samuel
Maciej, le lun. 19 févr. 2018 17:18:07 +0100, a ecrit:
> I shut the system down by clicking the "off switch" button in Gnome
> DE and then clicking the "Shut down" or "Restart" button. In about 50% of cases
> the shutdown process takes 90 seconds longer than in the other 50%.
Sergey Antonov, le lun. 26 févr. 2018 04:51:43 +0300, a ecrit:
> Hi. I have same problem with AT SPI...
>
> lut 06 14:30:47 B2-46-AA-2018 systemd[612]: at-spi-dbus-bus.service: State 'stop-sigterm' timed out. Killing.
> lut 06 14:30:47 B2-46-AA-2018 systemd[613]: pam_unix(systemd-user:session): session closed for user Debian-gdm
> lut 06 14:30:47 B2-46-AA-2018 systemd[612]: at-spi-dbus-bus.service: Killing process 648 (at-spi-bus-laun) with signal SIGKILL.
Simon McVittie, le lun. 26 févr. 2018 08:19:55 +0000, a ecrit:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 at 04:51:43 +0300, Sergey Antonov wrote:
> > Hi. I have same problem with AT SPI...
> >
> > lut 06 14:30:47 B2-46-AA-2018 systemd[612]: at-spi-dbus-bus.service: State 'stop-sigterm' timed out. Killing.
> > lut 06 14:30:47 B2-46-AA-2018 systemd[613]: pam_unix(systemd-user:session): session closed for user Debian-gdm
> > lut 06 14:30:47 B2-46-AA-2018 systemd[612]: at-spi-dbus-bus.service: Killing process 648 (at-spi-bus-laun) with signal SIGKILL.
>
> The per-user instance of systemd sends SIGTERM to at-spi-dbus-bus.service
> (at-spi-bus-launcher). If the processes in that service still haven't
> exited 90 seconds later, systemd logs this message and follows up
> with SIGKILL. That means at-spi-bus-launcher isn't exiting promptly,
> which seems like a bug in at-spi-bus-launcher.
Reply to: