[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#757152: python-pyatspi: Should depond on at-spi2-core OR qt-at-spi



I think there is a problem when both the frameworks are in use
together.

Nov 23 21:26:13 learner gnome-session[9951]: (gnome-shell:10216):
caribou-CRITICAL **: caribou_group_model_create_group_name: assertion
'group != NULL' failed
Nov 23 21:26:13 learner gnome-session[9951]: (gnome-shell:10216):
caribou-CRITICAL **: caribou_keyboard_model_populate_group: assertion
'group != NULL' failed
Nov 23 21:26:13 learner org.gnome.Caribou.Daemon[9980]:
(caribou:16512): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion
'G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
Nov 23 21:26:13 learner dbus-daemon[9980]: Successfully activated
service 'org.gnome.Caribou.Daemon'
Nov 23 21:26:17 learner org.gnome.Caribou.Daemon[9980]: **
(caribou:16512): WARNING **: AT-SPI: Error in GetItems, sender=(null),
error=Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote
application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy
blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection
was broken.


To me this looks like caribou daemon, which is supposed to pop-up the
soft keyboard, is mesbehaving. This message was seen when running
kwrite (kde5) which obviously will trigger the textinput field to pop-
up caribou keyboard.


On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 17:11 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 19:49 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Ritesh Raj Sarraf, on Sun 22 Nov 2015 21:57:12 +0530, wrote:
> > > I'm also curious to know if KDE5/Qt5 apps really support the at-
> > > spi
> > > bridge.
> > 
> > Qt5 actually embeds its own at-spi bridge.
> 
> That was my impression too, but it does not seem to be working, at
> least on Debian. Perhaps the Debian KDE Team (CCed) can confirm if it
> is supposed to work with KDE5/Qt5, or not.
> 
> 
-- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: