Bug#714314: libatk-bridge2.0-0: undefined symbol: atspi_is_initialized

To: Luke Yelavich <luke.yelavich@canonical.com>, 714314@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#714314: libatk-bridge2.0-0: undefined symbol: atspi_is_initialized
From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 21:32:15 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20130629193215.GM5735@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr>
Reply-to: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>, 714314@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20130628000610.GA3201@acapella>
References: <[🔎] 20130627202209.3063.27344.reportbug@hobag.chatsunix.int.mrv.com> <[🔎] 20130628000610.GA3201@acapella>

Luke Yelavich, le Fri 28 Jun 2013 10:06:10 +1000, a écrit :
> tags 714314 pending

Did you perhaps forget to push your branch?

Samuel

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#714314: libatk-bridge2.0-0: undefined symbol: atspi_is_initialized
  - From: Nye Liu <nyet@mrv.com>
- Bug#714314: libatk-bridge2.0-0: undefined symbol: atspi_is_initialized
  - From: Luke Yelavich <luke.yelavich@canonical.com>

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#714314: libatk-bridge2.0-0: undefined symbol: atspi_is_initialized
Next by Date: Processing of liblouis_2.5.3-1_amd64.changes
Previous by thread: Bug#714314: libatk-bridge2.0-0: undefined symbol: atspi_is_initialized
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#714314: libatk-bridge2.0-0: undefined symbol: atspi_is_initialized
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread