Re: Metapackages for accessibility
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 03:55:14PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
> * The "apps" tasks is very ambigious and overlaps with packages tags:
>...
I tried to follow the categorisation in the Wiki (website??). Just
dropped the task which seems to be in fact useless featuring only one
package.
> It feels alot more useful to solve the application categorisation
> problem with package tags,
What do you mean with "package tags"? Do you mean DebTags?
In fact I'm considering a closer connection between DebTags and the
Blends stuff but I have not yet made up my mind about this.
> * Toolkit tasks:
> 1. Where do we put mono-winforms-a11y?
I do not really understand this question. Please be more verbose what
package to put in which category if some decision is made.
> 2. Should we drop the gnome task since they are already handled via
> recommends?
Where is it recommended? If you ask me I would not drop the task even
if it might add some redundency.
> * natbraille is wrongly categorized, it should be in braille, not
> console.
It was also in braille (but only as suggests) but was not showing up
there because I had the extra information for the prospective package
only in one task file. I moved it now to braille. We might find a
final solution once it is really available as Debian package.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: