Re: Status of Gnopernicus in Sid?
On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 09:30, Mario Lang wrote:
> This is not really a bug, but a feature :-). Blinkies usually
> work with speech at that rate. Everything below is a pain to work with.
> I agree though that this should be somehow configurable in Gnopernicus, didn't
> find such a setting yet.
Interesting. What are blinkies? I tried a google search but it was
rather uninformative :)
> What I observed today is that when I tried to launch nautilus,
> it complained that the libgail-gnome module was not installed.
> After checking, I saw that it was really not installed.
> Well, unfortunately, I realized that I still had your hacked libatk1.0-1
> packages, and did a cleanup. After that, strangely, nautilus
> no longer complains about a missing libgail-gnome module.
> I'm wondering now, should gnopernicus depend on libgail-gnome-module,
> or is this just an ancient left-over?
I think it should, actually.
> I'm using gnopernicus 0.3.2 now (which is available
> from ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gnopernicus/0.3/
> as tarball. I'm not sure if 0.3.2 is that good, or
> if only the setting of the accessibility gconf key was the reason,
Ah, I didn't know about the gconf key! Yes, that sure made more things
talk.
> but if you find time, maybe you could do a new upload of 0.3.2?
> OTOH, if you want to get rid of gnopernicus, I *think* I *might*
> be able to aadopt it now. At least the build of 0.3.2 with your debian/
> dir went fine without any problems :)
Sure, if you'd like to take it over, I have no problem with that. Let
me know if you have any problems with the package; it is using my newly
developed build system (CDBS), but hopefully you'll like it :)
Reply to: