[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Thoughts on bug reporting course



On 19/09/2020 02:43, Paul Sutton wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Just sharing some thoughts on the bug reporting process for Debian and
> therefor some input for any related courses.
> 
> Last time I tried to do this, I found the process complex, I got tripped
>  up by seemingly getting the e-mail subject wrong.  My 2nd attempt was
> more successful.
> 
> Would it be possible for any courses to include:
> 
> Searching for existing bugs, perhaps an activity to search for a known
> bug, maybe we create an example bug that people know it is there for
> 'training purposes'.  so the dev team just in effect ignore it, but the
> Academyteam make use of.
> 
> So in terms of the actual bug report e-mail, as I said earlier I tripped
> up with the subject header, perhaps also the first line(s) of the e-mail.
> 
> provide the actual template as part of the course (it is text file anyway)
> dissect this to explain what is required and or expected at each section
> 
> Perhaps provide a few examples,  (linked to the example bug mentioned above)
> 
> I think also some sort of explanation on how to include relevant information
> 
> Program versions
> hardware info
> 
> there are probably specific programs we need to use for this,
> 
> so programname -v may give info on version
> uname -a
> neofetch (people can install, but it is not default, as far as I know)
> 
> What seems a plethora of other programs give just hardware information,
>  if we strip this down to a specific set of tools that come by default
> in debian  that way we can just do for example.
> 
> uname -a > kernelinfo.txt
> 
> If when reporting we can create  a folder say
> 
> userinfo ( one of the apps that comes with debian)
> 
> Then put all the required info, including a offline bug report in there,
>  collate everything together, including screen shots) then submit the
> report in the correct format,  it may make it more successful and
> reassure people they have provided the correct information.
> 
> finally as another activity we can reply to the bug (which seems to be a
> simple e-mail) in a specific way to demonstrate we understand that part
> of the course.
> 
> Just a thought, hope this helps.  We cannot  change the bug reporting
> process, just explain the process, so it is easier for people to
> understand and is more accessible to people.
> 
> Paul
> 
Hi Paul,

Feel free to create a course about reporting bugs in Debian using videos
or whatever you consider useful at Debian Academy,

Regards
Jathan

-- 
A permissive license would only be more "free" than a license like the
GPL, when a society that allows slavery be considered more free than
a society that does not.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: