Re: [issue18062] m68k FPU precision issue

[Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>]

Eero Tamminen dixit:

>> > Now as additional data point, UAE/WinUAE/etc. would be interesting.
>
>I built the test with fpu_control.h header from eglibc, using
>Sparemint GCC 2.9.5 (with 2010 binutils) and MiNTlib.  When it's

Nice ;)

>I.e. it seems that WinUAE FPU emulation is also lacking FPUCW change
>handling (for precision).
>
>(Hatari's WinUAE CPU core code was synched with upstream last year.)

OK, thanks. I’d just say let’s say changing FPU precision is not
part of the target we support. (Funnily enough, ColdFire according
to the ’net has (unchangeable) 64-bit precision… maybe let’s just
say precision on m68k in general is not defined.)

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
17:08⎜«Vutral» früher gabs keine packenden smartphones und so
17:08⎜«Vutral» heute gibts frauen die sind facebooksüchtig
17:10⎜«Vutral» aber auch traurig; früher warst du als nerd voll am arsch
17:10⎜«Vutral» heute bist du als nerd der einzige der wirklich damit klarkommt