Fwd: Bug#654329: libdrm: FTBFS when atomic operations are only available through libatomic-ops-dev
Without words. (The patch in question is a one-liner adding a
Build-Depends line with [m68k] appended to it, so it’d absolutely
do no harm to other architectures.)
Some maintainers were extraordinarily helpful… but this…
Totally baffled,
//mirabilos
--
13:37⎜«Natureshadow» Deep inside, I hate mirabilos. I mean, he's a good
guy. But he's always right! In every fsckin' situation, he's right. Even
with his deeply perverted taste in software and borked ambition towards
broken OSes - in the end, he's damn right about it :(! […] works in mksh
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
Message-ID: <20120617111025.GT12197@radis.cristau.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:10:25 +0200
Subject: Re: Bug#654329: libdrm: FTBFS when atomic operations are only available
through libatomic-ops-dev
tag 654329 wontfix
kthxbye
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 00:07:45 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> found 654329 2.4.33-1
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> please do consider applying the patch, as it does truly fix an FTBFS
> on m68k.
>
Yeah, no.
Cheers,
Julien
Reply to: