[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 3.2



On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 20:14 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> root@ara2:~ # cat /proc/version
> Linux version 3.2.0-1+m68k.1-atari (Debian 3.2.1-1+m68k.1) (tg@mirbsd.de) (gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian 4.6.2-11) ) #1 Mon Jan 23 06:44:50 UTC 2012
> 
> The Debian package has not finished building yet (it’s currently
> at the third (bvme*) of the six flavours), but since the Atari
> image is done, no kernel modules are needed for regular operation,
> and my vacation fell into the water of my friend’s car dieing on
> a mountain road, I thought I could test-boot it.
> 
> @Ben: debdiff attached; I used minimal changes:
> - CFLAGS_KERNEL: pass them to kbuild the right way
> - debian/changelog: use parts of them as you see fit
> - debian/patches/series/base: this would of course
>   be part of debian/patches/series/2 instead if you
>   choose to add this to the next upload
> - debian/config/defines: similarily
> - debian/config/m68k/defines: please add these two
>   + compiler: gcc-4.6 (so we’re en par with the other arches)
>   + cflags: -ffreestanding (to fix #648996)
> - debian/patches/bugfix/m68k/aufs-compile.patch: adding
>   this, even though it won’t make it into the mainline
>   kernel since Geert thinks static inline functions are
>   the way to go, as the least-intrusive way to get kernels
>   building for m68k until the aufs people have decided on
>   a proper fix; please keep this as debian-local diff until
>   such time (and we should prod them from time to time, I
>   guess)
> 
> Could these patches please be part of the next upload (which
> I’m guessing to come soon due to that procfs thing)?
[...]

Sorry, you missed it.  But we can upload again pretty soon.

All looks good except that I think aufs should be fixed by changing its
pr_fmt macro (which I thought I had done - sorry about that).

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Horngren's Observation:
                   Among economists, the real world is often a special case.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: