Re: [PATCH 1/2] topology: Check for missing CPU devices
- To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>, Debian kernel team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, debian-68k@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] topology: Check for missing CPU devices
- From: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 02:06:50 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] CAFLxGvwJWrSRSNxHE620XZkc4w0ayzeqqxZOR1efkh1V+VBO1w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] CA+55aFwwnJPpVY++Vgr6p3s47YjdYWV3sgLZzvCtiJp6DEu78Q@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[🔎] 1326055714.13595.309.camel@deadeye> <[🔎] CA+55aFwwnJPpVY++Vgr6p3s47YjdYWV3sgLZzvCtiJp6DEu78Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Ok, both of the patches look sane to me, but it would really be nice
> to hear from somebody with the actual affected architectures, and get
> a tested-by.
UML is affected:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/8/186
I wasted an hour finding out why it is crashing.
Instead of testing kernels I really should read more LKML. ;-)
--
Thanks,
//richard
Reply to: