Re: Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at

To: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
Cc: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 14:44:33 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] m2wrmn5sji.fsf@igel.home>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.00.1101020045180.11515@tglase.bonn.tarent.de> (Thorsten Glaser's message of "Sun, 2 Jan 2011 00:46:52 +0100 (CET)")
References: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.00.1101020045180.11515@tglase.bonn.tarent.de>

Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de> writes:

> Type safety: The method add(Object) belongs to the raw type Set. References to generic type Set<E> sSem_wait returned -1
> sem_wait for handler failed

What is the error?

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>

References:
- Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>

Prev by Date: Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at
Next by Date: Re: Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at
Previous by thread: Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at
Next by thread: Re: Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread