Re: [Bug 514579] Re: gcc-4.4 cross build for m68k on i486 fails
(Don’t Cc: me please, I read the debian-68k@ list.)
Finn Thain dixit:
>Hopefully, all those targets available to the etch-m68k compilers. Not
>sure whether fidoa was one of those?
Hrm. As I wrote in <Pine.BSM.4.64L.1004191952070.24486@herc.mirbsd.org>
it didn’t build (due to inline asm in glibc (2.7) headers).
>In your discussion with Matthias, I see that !defined(_GLIBCXX_HAVE_TLS)
>is given as the cause. As it happens, I've recently opened a couple of bug
>reports about backporting TLS [1, 2].
That would probably be the best fix – but I don’t know how difficult
it is or whether it’s feasible or who’s doing it or who’s prodding
doko to include that then…
>You'll see that I've requested that the patch "m68k-allow-gnu99.diff" be
>dropped from both 4.4 and 4.5. I hope this does not harm your work on gcc?
>4.3 at least, won't be affected.
I don’t think so, but it might affect systems with libc-2.7 still
installed (although I can probably circumvent that by passing
non-default CFLAGS everywhere). Unless you have a newer (e)glibc,
even when without TLS support, to get rid of that?
bye,
//mirabilos
--
I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it
when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them.
If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny
existence. -- Coywolf Qi Hunt
Reply to: