Re: toolchain, was Re: bogl: don't know screen type 1
*hurm* Well if it is the case that some dev at freescale has assumed
that producing binaries in a certain way that makes sense for the
coldfire series ( which might resemble the original enough to make it
seem sensible ) might explain the slowdown were seeing _across the
line_ ( be it amigaos linux or fuckos).
Bernd Roesch ( now included weather he likes it or not, sorry :) has
also made remarks and comparisons about this. As has the amigaos dev's
of ffmpeg, which has made it bleeding clear in the posts linked to
before
http://www.amiga.org/forums/showthread.php?t=47991&highlight=ffmpeg+slowdown
So no the slowdown from 333,340 to 4xx is not only amigaos, its
clearly visible booting the linux kernel too ... .
2009/9/5 mike <localgost@gmail.com>:
> The thing is, its been proven that gcc produces slower and slower 68k
> binaries, its probably not the linker in binutils at all
> see.
> http://www.amiga.org/forums/showthread.php?p=519318
> and ( not 100% sure if its the correct thread, but the natami team
> have noticed the issue
> http://www.natami.net/knowledge.php?b=3¬e=2&z=9M0ieT
>
> Including Gunnar Von Boehn in this now, cause they've done alot more
> research, and can probably fill in what freescale have, and havent
> done. I suspect they have been tweaking the code for newer "68k's" or
> coldfires, rather than branching it off?
>
> Cheers
> -Spike
>
> 2009/9/5 Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>:
>> On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 01:43:14AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 12:16:27AM +0200, mike wrote:
>>> > > Btw, i noticed an error
>>> > > http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/images/daily/build_nativehd.log
>>> > > E: Couldn't find package libnss-dns-udeb
>>> > > make[2]: *** [stamps/get_udebs-nativehd-stamp] Error 100
>>> > > make[1]: *** [_build] Error 2
>>> > > make: *** [build_nativehd] Error 2
>>> >
>>> > Yep. debian-installer dailies are now *dead* until we get a modern libc
>>> > working.
>>>
>>> I wonder whether there are debian source packages for binutils, gcc and
>>> glibc having TLS/NPTL support for m68k.
>>
>> I'd be surprised if that were the case.
>>
>>> The patches posted to the binutils mailing list are incomplete. The
>>> binutils patch at
>>> http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/tls/
>>> is broken according to Kolla:
>>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2009/07/msg00001.html
>>>
>>> But in that post (June 28) Maxim recommends using mainline binutils, and
>>> since then we have HJL binutils-2.19.51.0.14 released, "...based on
>>> binutils 2009 0722 in CVS on sourceware.org..." So I guess I should start
>>> there.
>>>
>>> I understand that the current GCC (4.4) lacks the necessary patches, and
>>> 4.5 is still uncooked (and that's a scary prospect). Can someone confirm
>>> that this is the necessary patch for 4.4:
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-05/msg01024.html
>>> Presumably not this one?
>>> http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/tls/gcc_patch2
>>> (and gcc_patch1 is clearly broken... perhaps it was actually the same
>>> thing before being mangled... Stephen, I don't think this "/tls" directory
>>> is helping any.)
>>
>> Shall I remove it then?
>>
>>> Or perhaps there is a known-good gcc 4.5 snapshot (FWIW, I'd much rather
>>> patch a debian compiler instead, which means 4.4 or preferably older.)
>>
>> It would be wonderful to have debian gcc 4.4 building on m68k. It
>> never has.
>>
>>> As for eglibc, there are a number of branches listed here,
>>> http://www.eglibc.org/repository
>>> The question is, which branch, snapshot or release might meet be suitable?
>>>
>>> With this information, I could attempt to build a toolchain from upstream
>>> sources, or figure out whether or not the debian archive has the necessary
>>> source packages...
>>
>> The life is fast ebbing from debian/m68k as far as I can tell. I'm not
>> sure if there is sufficient energy to revitalize it. I'd be delighted to
>> be proven wrong.
>>
>> Peace,
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>> --
>> Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
>> <stephen@marenka.net>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
Reply to: