On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:59:53PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: >> So it should be named bootstrap.tos or should that just be documented? > > I guess it should just be renamed - you don't usually care whether the > bootstrap runs as GEM or TOS app (the screen output is cleaner in the TOS > one anyway). Okay, I'll make a note of it for the next atari-bootstrap upload. > We should close it with the next kernel upload... with any luck, I'll > have the SMC91C111 driver working by then (it did finally own up to > detecting the proper hardware, instead of stuffing up the ROM-port card > or just hanging the kernel). Sounds great. >>> (Apologies if I seem unresponsive at this time - the mail system at my old >>> lab is migrated to postfix by a new admin, and that often results in no >>> mail going out for a few days ...) >> >> Bummer. Maybe when he's done we can get q650's mail working again. >> Running a buildd with email is a total drag. > > I guess I'll let him fix outgoing relay for the whole domain first, > before adding something like incoming relay :-) > > I'll play with postfix some on my UUCP relay so I'll have a config snip > ready when the time comes. > > Any news on the buildd front? Two potentials, but no solution yet. Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature