Re: [patch 3/2] m68k: Atari EtherNAT - add writew_be for data push
- To: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, debian-68k@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [patch 3/2] m68k: Atari EtherNAT - add writew_be for data push
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810142146480.25759@anakin>
- In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0809042347400.3429@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- References: <20080903071542.615137611@mail.of.borg> <20080903071741.424551678@mail.of.borg> <20080903073629.GD4104@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809032114590.23421@anakin> <alpine.DEB.1.00.0809042347400.3429@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> as you've probably noticed, my previous EtherNAT patch does not compile
> without this one being applied as well.
>
> Comments welcome (is there anyone on this list with access to an EtherNAT
> card,
> besides cts and myself?).
>
> Regarding performance afforded by having a 100 Mbit PHY instead of a 10 Mbit
> one:
>
> EtherNAT: 210 KB/s out, 140 KB/s in (scp of a 35 MB vmlinux file)
> EtherNEC: 175 KB/s out, 128 KB/s in (same file)
>
> Hardly worth it, eh?
That's slower than my Ariadne?
BTW, do you have a patch for this?
| drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:2317: error: 'struct smc91x_platdata' has no member named 'irq_flags'
| drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:2361: error: 'struct smc91x_platdata' has no member named 'irq_flags'
| drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:2371: error: 'struct smc91x_platdata' has no member named 'irq_flags'
| drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:2411: error: 'struct smc91x_platdata' has no member named 'irq_flags'
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Reply to: