On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 08:40:02PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:07:00AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > For the record I've been installing linux-libc-dev_2.6.24-6 on the > > buildds and marking it hold. This solved ftbfs for strace and insight at > > least. > > AFAIK the issue causing this build failure was fixed in libc6-dev > 2.7-11. Unfortunately, our libc6-dev is 2.5-11. We have hopes of TLS this year, but until then we can't move to the 2.7.x series without serious work. > As Lenny will probably ship with 2.6.26, you should not build packages > against that old linux-libc-dev version which isn't even in the archive > anymore. Our glibc isn't in the archive either and we aren't releasing. I figured working packages was a better tradeoff atm. At least is makes ftbfs easier to sort. Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature