[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [buildd] Implications of DSA-1571-1



On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 02:16:25AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>>> Well, those machines that were installed before etch, should be safe. Can
>>> anyone confirm this?
>>
>> Only if you have an RSA key. DSA (as in, Digital Signature Algorithm)
>> keys should be considered compromised, too, since they use the OpenSSL
>> randomizer, which is buggy.
>
> q650 has libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3sarge1 - the advisory said the bug was 
> introduced with 0.9.8c. So it would seem sarge installs are in the clear. 
> Can we confirm that in some way? Can we backport the fixes to sarge if 
> necessary?

Everything I've read says that sarge is in the clear.

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<stephen@marenka.net>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: