Re: more (aranym) buildds needed
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> But what's about the "removing packages"-idea like boost, flight simulators
> or other heavy weight apps rarely used on m68k?
> I think getting aranym buildds up and running will be just an intermediate
> solution. There are more and more packages to be, steadily increasing in
> number, and it seems just a matter of time when all those aranym buildds
> won't be enough again to keep up.
> Maybe we can get a natively built and uptodate core Debian for m68k and a
> best-effort {stable}-m68k suite for other software (built by aranym
> buildds)? And yes, it's difficult to tell which package should end up in
> core or in {stable}-m68k...
apt-proxy coupled to an autobuilder?
And hope nobody tries to DoS us using `apt-get install openoffice.org'?
;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Reply to: