[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [buildd] Machines upgraded




On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Larry Moore wrote:

> 
> Since we have a functioning framebuffer in 2.2.25-mac, is here a
> technical reasn why it couldn't be copy-pasted into 2.6.23?
>

The reason is internal kernel APIs. But there's no need since Linux 2.6.23 
should have a working framebuffer (and console). 2.6.22 does. It may be 
that there are some fixes still needed from 2.2, but more likely we are in 
need of fixes for xorg.

-f


Reply to: