[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [buildd] Machines upgraded

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Larry Moore wrote:

> Since we have a functioning framebuffer in 2.2.25-mac, is here a
> technical reasn why it couldn't be copy-pasted into 2.6.23?

The reason is internal kernel APIs. But there's no need since Linux 2.6.23 
should have a working framebuffer (and console). 2.6.22 does. It may be 
that there are some fixes still needed from 2.2, but more likely we are in 
need of fixes for xorg.


Reply to: