Re: Draft TLS/NPTL ABI for m68k and ColdFire, version 0.2

To: Brad Boyer <flar@allandria.com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Draft TLS/NPTL ABI for m68k and ColdFire, version 0.2
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:42:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0712031841010.1819@scrub.home>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20071130233829.GA5476@cynthia.pants.nu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711301901100.20112@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <[🔎] 20071130233829.GA5476@cynthia.pants.nu>

Hi,

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Brad Boyer wrote:

> I presume ColdFire is also missing CAS2. Do we need a 64 bit cmpxchg
> equivalent as well?

cas2 is an emulated instruction on 68060, so we might want to avoid direct 
usage on m68k as well.

bye, Roman

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Draft TLS/NPTL ABI for m68k and ColdFire, version 0.2
  - From: Brad Boyer <flar@allandria.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Draft TLS/NPTL ABI for m68k and ColdFire, version 0.2
Next by Date: Re: Draft TLS/NPTL ABI for m68k and ColdFire, version 0.2
Previous by thread: Re: Draft TLS/NPTL ABI for m68k and ColdFire, version 0.2
Next by thread: Re: Draft TLS/NPTL ABI for m68k and ColdFire, version 0.2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread