Re: gcl on kullervo
Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> =============================================================================
> Maybe it should be requeued in an upgraded chroot as linux-kernel-headers is
> recently dropped in favour of linux-libc-dev which could indeed make a
> difference for a used kernel header AFAICS.
>
> Note that I'm upgrading the chroot on crest atm...
>
> Cheers
>
> Luk
>
>
> =============================================================================
>
> Yes, just verified that the problem is absent on crest unstable
> chroot. Would it be possible to requeue?
Sure, that should be doable. I gave it back together with binutils which
appeared to be in the same situation.
Cheers
Luk
Reply to: