[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gcl on kullervo

Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings!  Trying to reproduce 
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gcl;ver=2.6.7-34;arch=m68k;stamp=1183906243
> on kullervo dchroot sid, but get like on crest
> /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE   -DTRAD_CORE   -I. -I. -I./../include  -I./../intl -I../intl   -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -c -o trad-core.lo trad-core.c
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTRAD_CORE -I. -I. -I./../include -I./../intl -I../intl -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -c trad-core.c -o trad-core.o
> rm -f tofiles
> f=""; \
> for i in elf32-m68k.lo elf32.lo elf.lo elflink.lo elf-strtab.lo elf-eh-frame.lo dwarf1.lo m68klinux.lo aout32.lo elf32-gen.lo cpu-m68k.lo trad-core.lo ; do \
>  ...
> Advice appreciated.  I'd like not to drop m68k from the arch list, as
> this would take maxima, hol88, axiom and acl2 with it.
> Should the package simply be requeued?

Maybe it should be requeued in an upgraded chroot as linux-kernel-headers is
recently dropped in favour of linux-libc-dev which could indeed make a
difference for a used kernel header AFAICS.

Note that I'm upgrading the chroot on crest atm...



Reply to: