Re: FYI: binutils and gcc-4.2 build failures on m68k

To: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Cc: debian-68k@lists.debian.org, Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: FYI: binutils and gcc-4.2 build failures on m68k
From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@mail.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 12:50:10 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0705041235130.13839@xplor.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
In-reply-to: <17978.42867.817108.256307@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
References: <17978.42867.817108.256307@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

> - binutils currently FTBFS, this failure appeared after glibc-2.5 was
>   built on m68k?
>   see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=binutils&ver=2.17cvs20070426-4&arch=m68k&stamp=1178147857&file=log

Looks like it; at least, 2.5-3 is currently installed.

Looking at asm/page.h, PAGE_SIZE should be defined, although it is defined
as 8k (when did we switch away from 4k?). That's from the kernel headers
(linux-kernel-headers 2.6.18-1), though.

Anything I can do to resolve this?

	Michael

Reply to:

References:
- FYI: binutils and gcc-4.2 build failures on m68k
  - From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>

Prev by Date: FYI: binutils and gcc-4.2 build failures on m68k
Next by Date: Re: [buildd] Another binNMU for pokerth
Previous by thread: FYI: binutils and gcc-4.2 build failures on m68k
Next by thread: Re: FYI: binutils and gcc-4.2 build failures on m68k
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread