Re: [buildd] failed packages
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:36:17PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I looked through the failed packages yesterday and found some that had
> > strange gcc failures, how does gcc know a bug is not reproducible?
> > http://www.buildd.net/cgi/package_status?unstable_pkg=texmaker&searchtype=m68k&arch=m68k
> > The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem.
> > Since aahz was idle, I requed texmaker there and it build fine, I will try
> > schroot next. Is hobbes still running at 95MHz?
> No, it's running at 85 MHz. Since I took the disk off the failing power
> supply it has run fairly stable.
> Should I try texmaker on hobbes?
aahz built it fine and it is already uploaded. But if hobbes is idle and you
want to test this, sure, go ahead.