Re: [buildd] Known workaround for graphicsmagick failure?

To: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [buildd] Known workaround for graphicsmagick failure?
From: Daniel Kobras <kobras@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:48:41 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060808124841.GB15252@antares.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060807140013.GS10161@marenka.net>
References: <[🔎] 20060807114603.GC15544@antares.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> <[🔎] 20060807140013.GS10161@marenka.net>

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:00:13AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:46:03PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> 
> > graphicsmagick 1.1.7-6 failed to build on m68k due to what looks
> > suspiciously like a binutils bug:
> 
> I agree. I've just uploaded a binutils binNMU which should hopefully fix
> the problem. I've requeued graphicsmagick on a buildd that already has
> the new binutils installed.

Thanks! The rebuild looks good indeed.

Regards,

Daniel.

Reply to:

References:
- [buildd] Known workaround for graphicsmagick failure?
  - From: Daniel Kobras <kobras@debian.org>
- Re: [buildd] Known workaround for graphicsmagick failure?
  - From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [buildd] client_process_control: wrong client version 1
Next by Date: Re: [buildd] Etch?
Previous by thread: Re: [buildd] Known workaround for graphicsmagick failure?
Next by thread: Re: [buildd] Known workaround for graphicsmagick failure?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread