Re: [buildd] Etch?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 01:43:46AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I don't know what everyone else thinks about it here, but it would
>>> appear to me that making it in time for Etch is not going to happen
>>> anymore now.
>>> * Too many compiler bugs
>> Do you have the toolchain bug IDs at hand?
>
> The issues I know about and have been chasing when I have time are at
> <http://wiki.debian.org/DebianM68kGcc>.
>
> My thoughts on the current failed packages (that are m68k-specific) are
> loosely sorted out at
> <http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68kbugs/reports/failed-bynotes.html>.
Impertinent question, maybe: does anyone using m68k use, for
example, Mozilla or Evolution? I'd be adverse to running KDE, Konq,
GNOME 2.14, Evo, Mozilla, Tbird, FF, etc, etc all on a 10 year old
machine.
If these RAM hogging apps are marked no-build, would that raise the
build percentage?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFE0m+xS9HxQb37XmcRAvvQAKCIm5J5r7fbQ1rhWjozoWf3AHaaGwCg6OF9
+UQ/e1jzu/eZmt2ZEx3c5xs=
=X2Ri
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: