[stephen@marenka.net: Re: Bug#362590: FTBFS on m68k]

[Reinhard Tartler <siretart@tauware.de>]

Package: ftp.debian.org

Please remove the following m68k binary packages from unstable.

Discussion about this happened here:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2006/04/msg00021.html

xpilot-ng-client-x11_1:4.7.2-1.1
xpilot-ng-client-sdl_1:4.7.2-1.1
rss-glx_8.0.5-5
python-openal_0.1.5-1
libosgal-cvs1_20060215-5
libopenalpp-cvs1_20060217-2
libopenal-dev_0.2005080600-2.1+b1
flightgear_0.9.9-1
crystalspace_0.98-20040623-2.1
chromium_0.9.12-11

openal has been marked 'not-for-us' and should be in p-a-s soon, so
those binaries should not come back.

----- Forwarded message from Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net> -----

Envelope-to: siretart@tauware.de
Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:37:40 +0200
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:36:49 -0500
From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>
To: Reinhard Tartler <siretart@tauware.de>
Cc: Debian GNU/Linux m68k <debian-68k@lists.debian.org>,
	m68k-build@nocrew.org
Subject: Re: Bug#362590: FTBFS on m68k
Mail-Followup-To: Reinhard Tartler <siretart@tauware.de>,
	Debian GNU/Linux m68k <debian-68k@lists.debian.org>,
	m68k-build@nocrew.org

It looks like the concensus is that right now there's no real point 
in building openal and friends on m68k.

I've marked openal not-for-us and I'll include it in an update to p-a-s
soon.

You'll need to request to have the old m68k binaries removed.

Thanks,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<stephen@marenka.net>



----- End forwarded message -----