[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#340563: Optimizer bug, presumably.



On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:08:29AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:37:37PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Wouter,
> > 
> > Thanks very much for your help on this bug!
> > 
> > On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 05:58:10PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > 
> > > My previous attempt wasn't of much help, I presume ;-)
> > 
> > No.  :-)
> > 
> > But you did say there that the failure is there even compiling with
> > -O0.  Is that correct?
> 
> There is a failure even when compilin without -O. However, it seems to
> be a different one.

just a thought, since %a5 is used for special purpose by PIC code
is it possible the libraries were compiled with inconsistent PIC
settings? I thought that this would generally not cause crashes
but maybe it does under special circumstances?

I have myself very little idea what PIC/nonPIC code mixing does and
what the rules are.


Regards
Richard



Reply to: