On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:46:59PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Ok, sorry, I misread this part, but this would mean much less perfomance > for CF, as the differences from 68020 to CF can be quite large. > A dedicated CF port would IMO make more sense, if that one is working, the > m68k port would automatically benefit from it as well. Of course, what I intended to do is to have the standard Coldfire port capable of running m68k legacy binaries by working at the kernel level. I thought that was also Wouter's idea in Alioth Coldfire mailing-list early posts. Cheers, -- .''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME : :' : `. `'` Free Software Developer `- Unix Sys & Net Admin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature