[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ColdFire was Re: [buildd] Etch?

On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:46:59PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Ok, sorry, I misread this part, but this would mean much less perfomance 
> for CF, as the differences from 68020 to CF can be quite large.
> A dedicated CF port would IMO make more sense, if that one is working, the 
> m68k port would automatically benefit from it as well.

Of course, what I intended to do is to have the standard Coldfire port
capable of running m68k legacy binaries by working at the kernel level.

I thought that was also Wouter's idea in Alioth Coldfire mailing-list
early posts.

 .''`.   Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :'  :
`. `'`   Free Software Developer
  `-     Unix Sys & Net Admin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: