On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:28:30AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> that's unreproducible on crest/sid, although I can reproduce it on
> another machine with the very same versions of gcc-4.0 and libc6. So
> why not file it for libc6?
What cpu type is that other machine? I assume that ska is a 040?
> The point of reassigning the report to an unknown package is to ask,
> if it's time to drop m68k from the release architectures or just set
> the severity of all m68k reports to wishlist. There's currently nobody
> interested in forwarding m68k related bug reports upstream and testing
> m68k compiler versions. There are at least six more unhandled m68k
> reports.
> My email from July (http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/07/msg00069.html)
> is left unanswered, so I have to assume, that m68k isn't supported
> anymore and will start to downgrade all m68k related reports to a
> non-RC severity.
Uhm? Unanswered? I thought Wouter and Adam step up to fill the gap?
--
Ciao... // Fon: 0381-2744150
Ingo \X/ SIP: 2744150@sipgate.de
gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature