Re: Results of various tests with MVME167
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:17:35PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Kars de Jong wrote:
> > So I built the 126.96.36.199 kernel based on my old config, and voila, it
> > worked fine...
> > Now it was time to find out which config option caused the problem...
> > Took me quite some recompile/reboot cycles, but it turned out to be
> > CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK. If this is NOT defined as "Y", the kernel
> > crashes. And this is apparently also true for 2.4.x (x > ??) kernels.
> IIRC, Richard Zidlicky reported this before, too.
in my case it was not the mere setting of the config option but
the actual usage of additional memory chunks.
Only seen this problem with 2.6