[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libc6-dev conflict



On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 07:38:11PM +0000, Lance Tagliapietra wrote:
> [Note: Posted to the list, as the original reply went directly
> to Christian.]
> 
> Hi Christian,
> 
> Thanks for replying to my inquiry.  My information is different than
> what you provided.  When I installed Woody, I did tell the installer
> that I wanted the security updates when I installed Woody.
> 
> My Apt sources list:
> #deb http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
> #deb-src http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
> #deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
> #deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
> 
> #deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
> 
> deb http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
> deb-src http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
> deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
> 
> deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
> 
> ***end***
> 
> My tools don't tell me that a 2.3.* is available, just 2.2.*.  Are you
> running stuff from testing?  For example:

I assume, from unstable. See the thread on debian-powerpc and bugs
about 2.3.x being broken, maybe this is what you are running into.

-- 
Debian GNU/Linux Operating System
  By the People, For the People
Chris Tillman (a people instance)
   toff one at cox dot net



Reply to: