Re: XFree86's HasLinuxInput symbol and m68k
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:54:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > #ifdef LINUX_INPUT
> > if (xf86SetBoolOption(local->options, "USB", (common->wcmOpen == xf86WcmUSBOpen))) {
> > local->read_input=xf86WcmReadUSBInput;
> > common->wcmOpen=xf86WcmUSBOpen;
> > xf86Msg(X_CONFIG, "%s: reading USB link\n", dev->identifier);
> > #else
> > if (xf86SetBoolOption(local->options, "USB", 0)) {
> > ErrorF("The USB version of the driver isn't available for your platform\n");
> > #endif
> >
> > Will it kill anyone to have this code in the XFree86 packages for m68k?
>
> No USB on m68k as far as I know (I can hear already the shouts "but there
> is this cool USB Adapter for Amiga"), so this should never be executed on
> m68k. Maybe not even compiled (I did not read the code too thoroughly).
The input core does compile on m68k if you really want to, but no devices use
it (for now). So as soon as we get this USB support, the input core will be
ready ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Reply to: