[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: fails to build gtk+2.0



On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:47:59AM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> [I'm not subscribing this list. so plaese CCed me if you
> reply this mail]
> 
> As the subject says it, building of gtk+2.0 is
> failed.
> (http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gtk%2B2.0&ver=2.2.1-3&arch=m68k&stamp=1048257206&file=log&as=raw)
> 
> I got the same fails before (Bug#177840), and I got it again
> (Bug#186813). the bug submitter said, there was discussion
> on debian-gcc about a similar bug, and it was fixed in gcc
> 3.3 CVS.
> As he suggested, if it can be fixed by using gcc-snapshot,
> would someone like to build it?

Actually, I'm currently working on building it using -O1 in the pixops
Makefile instead of -O2. For various reasons, it's taken me longer than
usual. Hopefully, I'll be done today or tomorrow.

> Although I read gcc-snapshot's description, I need to help
> you guys anyway.

Unfortunately, the latest version of gcc-snapshot for m68k is currently 
20030309, which won't do you much good since the fix is in 20030320.
However, I'm really glad that you pointed out that a fix exists because
this is effecting a number of packages. That and hopefully the fix will
be backported soonish.

Using gcc-snapshot is usually just a matter of pointing your CC to
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc. I'll try it out if I have a chance when 
we get a recent gcc-snapshot.

If you want to follow up on this yourself, you can use crest. It's setup
for developer use.

Thanks,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<stephen@marenka.net>

Attachment: pgpjx8SEQEdnc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: