Re: linux-2.4.20 CVS kernel-image for mac
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 04:18, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > So this does not work...
> >
> > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/debian/linux-m68k/linux-2.4/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
> > -Wno-trigraphs -O2
> > -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-strength-reduce -ffixed-a2
> > -nost
> > dinc -iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=smc9194 -c -o smc9194.o smc9194.c
> > smc9194.c: In function `smc_reset':
> > smc9194.c:316: warning: implicit declaration of function `outw'
> > smc9194.c:320: warning: implicit declaration of function `inw'
> > smc9194.c:341: warning: implicit declaration of function `outb'
> > smc9194.c: In function `smc_wait_to_send_packet':
> > smc9194.c:532: warning: implicit declaration of function `inb'
> > smc9194.c: In function `smc_hardware_send_packet':
> > smc9194.c:614: warning: implicit declaration of function `outl'
> > smc9194.c:631: warning: implicit declaration of function `outsl'
> > smc9194.c: In function `smc_rcv':
> > smc9194.c:1335: warning: implicit declaration of function `insl'
> > smc9194.c:1337: warning: implicit declaration of function `insb'
>
> Yes, smc9194 wasn't ported to the new I/O framework yet, where inb() and
> friends are restricted to ISA and PCI I/O.
>
> Simply replacing all inb() by in_8() etc. is not an option, since this driver
> is used on PC as well. But probably you could add
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MAC
> #undef inb
> #define inb in_8
> ...
> #endif
>
> > macsonic.c: In function `macsonic_init':
> > macsonic.c:145: warning: `lp' might be used uninitialized in this function
> > In file included from macsonic.c:680:
> > sonic.c: In function `sonic_send_packet':
> > sonic.c:120: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> > sonic.c:120: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> > macsonic.c: At top level:
> > sonic.c:90: warning: `sonic_tx_timeout' defined but not used
>
> The sonic driver is still not ported over to the new softirq scheme, which was
> introduced in 2.3.x IIRC.
>
> > Any patches for the mac? But Ray said 2.4 does not boot, so I'll try atari
> > next.
>
> I applied all patches I'm aware of. And I always compile-test kernels with
> all[*] features enabled. Atari should compile, except for some Ethernet
> drivers.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> [*] The features I know that still compile, to catch compile-regressions. I.e.
> I removed smc9194 and macsonic from my list a while ago.
I'm working currently working on these drivers. They are used by the
PPC Nubus port also. I'm now starting to work with the PPC Nubus port
as well as m68k Mac. As soon as I have code that compiles on both
platforms I'll do a commit.
Ray
Reply to: