Re: Request for build: mpg123. - why I think its free
On Saturday, March 30, 2002, at 06:24 PM, Mark Eichin wrote:
several computers, I can tell you that it is just as free as Debian
True, his license restricts usage to non-commercial. However, the GPL
Dude, you're on crack. Read the DFSG some time. Especially the clause:
"No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor"
It isn't for you to judge what is "as free" or not; the DFSG *defines*
Free for debian. While there is a process for changing that, absent
such changes, we *apply* it.
First off, I'm not on crack :)
Second, perhaps my email was not to define the word 'free', but rather
to highlight the discrepancy of the usage of 'free' on this list, and to
We can argue about what free software is else where. And you're right,
according to that definition, this isn't free.
But I just want to point out to some people here that for most people
who see beyond the debian definition of 'free', this is free software.
And, to some people (especially BSD users like myself), Linux fails the
But, once again, as far as this list, and debian is concerned, Mark has
a point. The word 'free' is only useful when you understand how it is
being defined, which I did not.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org