Re: working xfree86 4.1.0?
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 07:51:21PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> |> I got 1 compile problem, asm/ptrace.h (kernel) got included somehow
> |> in m68klinux-nat.c and the PT_* defs conflicted with sys/reg.h (glibc).
> |> I fixed it by hiding the ptrace stuff inside __KERNEL__ but imho glibc
> |> sys/reg.h definition looks pretty strange.
>
> What's strange with it?
enum
{
PT_D1 = 0,
#define PT_D1 PT_D1
...
what's the advantage of such code compared to asm/ptrace.h?
Bye
Richard
Reply to: