Re: Do we really need gcc-m68k-linux?

To: "Martin Michlmayr" <tbm@cyrius.com>, "Wouter Verhelst" <wouter@debian.org>
Cc: <idalton@ferret.dyndns.org>, <debian-68k@lists.debian.org>, <m68k-build@nocrew.org>
Subject: Re: Do we really need gcc-m68k-linux?
From: "Christopher C. Chimelis" <chris@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 17:16:29 -0400
Message-id: <005701c10660$efd53900$ac3ce9c0@landshark>
References: <20010705184653.A9056@ferret.phonewave.net> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0107061028480.475-100000@rock.dezevensprong.local> <20010706230251.A29794@fisch.cyrius.com>

> Well, can someone NMU the package and fix the FHS issues?  Perhaps
> someone can sponsor Ferret's upload.

Let me know if someone does this.  Right now, there may/may not be a
binutils-m68k to accompany it due to necessary changes in binutils (I can
upload one if needed).

C

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do we really need gcc-m68k-linux?
  - From: idalton@ferret.dyndns.org

References:
- Re: Do we really need gcc-m68k-linux?
  - From: idalton@ferret.dyndns.org
- Re: Do we really need gcc-m68k-linux?
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: Do we really need gcc-m68k-linux?
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Do we really need gcc-m68k-linux?
Next by Date: Newbie Amiga install help
Previous by thread: Re: Do we really need gcc-m68k-linux?
Next by thread: Re: Do we really need gcc-m68k-linux?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread