Re: Do we really need gcc-m68k-linux?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Is there any reason to keep gcc-m68k-linux in Debian? It is not well
> maintained (i.e. hasn't made the FHS transition). Is it needed, or
> can it be removed?
IMO, it's completely useless in this state. It's that old that it's not
even possible to compile a kernel with the thing.
The last maintainer upload was in 1998; the last non-maintainer upload was
done to fix a dependency, this year.
Since the normal gcc package should allow one to compile a cross-compiler
(Which I tried, but did not succeed to do, probably because I made an
error somewhere), I don't think it's still necessary to keep
gcc-m68k-linux in the archive.
> (please Cc me.)
done, and Cc'ed to email@example.com too, since that's the list for
m68k builders, while debian-68k is more for users of m68k systems...
wouter dot verhelst at advalvas in belgium
resistance is futile, you will be packaged...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----