[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [2.2r3] Status report - Request for Discussion

Philip Blundell wrote:
> >I'm building 2.2.19 kernels for ARM at the moment.  This will probably take 
> >most of the afternoon, but if all goes well I will do potato boot-floppies 
> >next.
> The netwinder kernel image didn't build properly, and I wasn't able to fix it 
> in time to make the boot-floppies.  I've uploaded the RiscPC kernel image and 
> the kernel-patch package, though, and should have the other stuff by tomorrow.

And new kernels even got stuck in the incoming directory because ftpmaster
weren't informed before dinstall run.

Affectec packages:

-rw-r--r--    1 holgate  Debian       1058 Apr 14 19:15 kernel-headers-2.2.19-m68k_2.2.19-2_m68k.changes
-rw-r--r--    1 pb       Debian       1052 Apr 15 14:47 kernel-image-2.2.19-riscpc_20010414_arm.changes
-rw-r--r--    1 pb       Debian       1045 Apr 15 14:42 kernel-patch-2.2.19-arm_20010414_i386.changes
-rw-r--r--    1 holgate  Debian       1077 Apr 14 18:19 kernel-patch-2.2.19-m68k_2.2.19-2_m68k.changes

If somebody has a good reason for not postponing these kernels for
2.2r4, speak up NOW!!

  1. There has not yet been a security advisory covering any 2.2.19

  2. There are no boot-floppies around built with these kernels.
     This will only happen for 2.2r4 anyway.



GNU GPL: "The source will be with you... always."

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.

Reply to: