Re: Level of displaying sponsorship
also sprach Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> [2014.08.13.2259 +0200]:
> > Seriously, this is a bit about respect to speakers: if you get the
> > 10:00 o'clock slot on Thursday or Friday and only 20 people show up
> > because the rest is still in bed or getting breakfast, it kinda
> > sucks, right?
>
> Which is why we should start sessions from 11:00 on or so.
Realistically speaking, that just means people will stay up and
sleep in longer. And it means we have less time slots.
> But in general, I think this is a good idea, except it might be
> difficult to organize among the various talk rooms unless we decide to
> have a plenary every morning as first session.
Yes, that was my idea.
also sprach Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> [2014.08.13.2303 +0200]:
> Some kind of middle ground would be that we guarantee to/convice
> the sponsor that the Debian person addressing the crowd will
> mention the sponsor. That'd be Christian for C&W and the DPL for
> the conf dinner I guess. Or if they refuse/forget, somebody from
> the organizers should jump in.
What's the difference between Christian saying a few words and the
sponsor saying a few words?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
This space unintentionally left blank.
Reply to: