Hello everyone, Added: debconf-team@lists.debconf.org & admin@debconf.org On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:20PM -0800, Matto Marjanovic wrote: > On 11/03/13 17:16, Steve Langasek wrote: > >On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:45:58PM +0100, Raphaël Walther wrote: > >>I don't think it is good for us to have two lists serving the same > >>purpose. I don't remember exactly what was the idea behind creating a > >>separate list but I'd suggest to drop one of them. > > > >>Any thoughts ? > > > >The original motivation was to have a mailing list where we could begin > >discussing DC14 planning while DC13 was still under way. I think this is a > >good idea in general. > > > >Now that DC13 is over, the focus on both lists will be DC14, so it may make > >sense to have everyone on a single debconf-team list. However, I have no > >idea if everyone who's subscribed to debconf14-team has also subscribed to > >debconf-team. Furthermore, as we're going through DC14 organization, I'm > > I, one random dude in Portland, am not subscribed to debconf-team. > > I thought debconf14-team was "the mailing list for organizing DebConf14", > and since I wanted to help out in some varying capacity, I subscribed to it. > I didn't even notice debconf-team until a few days ago, and if there was any > DebConf14-related content send exclusively to that list, I have missed it. > > Here is my suggestion: > * Mothball 'debconf-team' going forward --- maybe use for DebConfN<14 > topics, but no longer for DebConf14. > > * Use 'debconf14-team' for all DebConf14 related work. > * When it's time to start discussing DebConfXX in the future, > create the corresponding debconfXX-team list. > * Return to using 'debian-portland-soc' for announcing meetups at > the Lucky Lab and other social activities not related to DebConf14. > W.r.t. the last point, the duplicate emails are annoying. If one wants to > attract DebConf14 participation from people subscribing to debian-portland-soc > in the future (all 1 of them, maybe), then stick an advert in the welcome- > -to-the-list message. Well, my point of view is one team, one list :) (and keep the 10 years of archive) There was a consensus in that meeting that migrating to lists.debian.org was the right things to do. http://meetbot.debian.net/debconf-team/2013/debconf-team.2013-05-23-18.02.log.html#l-676 After reading IRC log i am wondering what is the point of view of Ganneff on that migration ? Is somebody working on migrating these lists with archive to lists.debian.org ? Cheers, Raphaël
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature